Bangladesh’s interim government has come under criticism from opposition parties and civil society groups for allegedly rushing through major contracts and policy decisions ahead of the upcoming national election.
Critics have questioned the timing of approvals related to large infrastructure projects, energy deals and procurement contracts, arguing that an interim administration is expected to focus on routine governance rather than long-term or high-value commitments.
Opposition leaders have accused the interim setup of overstepping its mandate and demanded greater transparency in decision-making. They have also called for the release of detailed information on the contracts, including bidding processes and financial terms.
In response, the interim government has defended its actions, saying that decisions are being taken in the national interest and to avoid delays in ongoing development projects. Officials have maintained that all procedures are being followed in accordance with existing laws.
The controversy has added to political tension in the run-up to the election, with observers warning that perceptions of bias or lack of transparency could undermine public confidence in the electoral process and the neutrality of the interim administration.
