The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a nationwide policy to provide menstrual leave for women students and working professionals. The bench observed that such matters fall within the domain of the government and policy-making authorities, not the judiciary.
The PIL had urged the Court to direct the Centre to frame a uniform policy ensuring menstrual leave across educational institutions and workplaces. The petitioner argued that menstrual health and related challenges require institutional recognition and support to promote gender equality and dignity.
The Court, however, noted that while the issue is important, it cannot intervene in framing policies, which are best addressed by the executive and legislature. The bench suggested that the petitioner approach the Ministry of Women and Child Development or other relevant government departments for consideration.
The rejection of the PIL has reignited debate on menstrual leave policies in India. While some states and private organizations have introduced limited provisions, there is currently no nationwide framework. Advocates continue to push for broader recognition of menstrual health in workplace and education policies.
